SR. COUNCILLOR OF PUBLIC SAFETY.
That in relation to the Board of Police held in today, which discussed the Grant of Local Police Medal to counsel, MU, whose proposal was voted down by the Union Sections of the USO, CCOO and CSIF, the shop steward of the USO would like to express the reasons why the union rejected this proposition: Step to transcribe verbatim
content of Articles 25, 26, and 27 of the Rules of Decorations and Awards for Meritorious Actions in the Field of Civil Protection of Local Police Corps of the City Council on the Local Police Medal of Lucena, where he says:
"Art 25 .- The Local Police Medal for distinguished
Lucena is honorable, actions designed to recognize meritorious of
citizens, utilities, or other professional
Forces of State Security or members
private security outside the Local Police of Lucena.
Article 26 .- In order to preserve the exceptional nature of
award of the Medal of the Local Police of Lucena,
will be reserved for exceptional cases granting ,
must take into account the nature of merits and services rendered,
the importance of the work for the benefit and honor of the City
and the particular circumstances of the person or institution subject to the award
proposal.
27 .- The granting of this distinction will
plenary jurisdiction of the Corporation, and be granted by agreement
whole, the vote in favor of a simple majority of members
, must be that point on the agenda of that meeting
a proposal of the Hon. Mr. Mayor-President or Councillor-
Area Officer Safety, after assessment, the Council
local police
existing reports on the events. "
For the foregoing reasons, I conclude the follows: FIRST
. In its article 25 to the Local Police Medal of Lucena is a recognition of meritorious actions by citizens or professionals from other Security Forces of both state and private security.
First requirement is not met . SECOND
. As stated by Article 26, and in order to preserve the exceptional nature of the granting of that medal, be set aside its grant to "exceptional circumstances" for his performance , all with special significance provided is the benefit and honor of the city, not for the benefit of an institution or individual.
second requirement is not met. THIRD
. With regard to article 27, I have to say that the Police Board said no assessment of existing reports on the events. Moreover, not submitted any report in fact happened, precisely because there has been no action or exceptionally meritorious deed or by a citizen , agent, or watchman to benefit importance and honor for the City as a whole.
Third requirement is not met.
For all these reasons, and because the present case refers to a lawyer who works in the service of this City, like other do or did in their time, without detracting from its good professional, I must inform you that not the Local Police Medal of Lucena that accruing recognition of services rendered by this attorney to the Consistory, but other distinction. Since this regulation decorated and distinguished by meritorious performances in the Field of Civil Protection, and this proposal is not within the same collection. Lucena
November 30, 2010
The Steward of the USO.
Martos José Moya.