In the last session of the General Board Trading Day 01.14.1910, was included in one of your points to discuss and approve the case, the allegations in exposed above document dated 12/21/2009.
Despite an initial provision of the policy of acceptance of the deficiency and request the members of the Bureau for a period of adaptation to be the Delegation Staff assumes that the processing and application of the monthly amounts complement of productivity called for a recess of one of the unions (USPLL), to ask that USE and CCOO withdraw the item on the agenda and other unions did not support the complaint.
USPLL The justification was argued, because if productivity ceased to be processed outside of the Local Police Headquarters, the other officials were to alarm the productivity figures of the policemen, and they could lose all the productivity pending consider whether real job application, and therefore more advisable to follow in the process of productivity in the Head PL, behind the rest of the staff.
Actually, this position is no stranger to USPLL us, it was they who took delivery of C. Specific to pass them to C. Productivity (eg at night), but what is strange is that we will support other unions, and the outcome of the vote in the Bureau, despite the political bias reviewed, the complaint was rejected after a dubious interpretation of the rules of the current Framework Agreement. CCOO and USO
no agreements "behind the curtain", and believe that now is giving money to the police productivity of correturnos. Meter
fear alone results in more fear. This negotiating behind the curtain does not benefit those who are hidden negotiation, or to the other side of the curtain, allegedly benefited, because they have been deprived of a consolidation of compensation rights in the C. Specific, amply deserved and should be openly and proven, not dark and in constant penance.
Enough of wage increases with fireworks and wise men of unionism, to finally stay only with smoke, the smell of burnt horn and union kings are nothing more than a petty trileros.
Therefore, CCOO and USO, seek legal-technical report-writing, from where it belongs Processing and economic application of C. Staff productivity of this City.
USPLL The justification was argued, because if productivity ceased to be processed outside of the Local Police Headquarters, the other officials were to alarm the productivity figures of the policemen, and they could lose all the productivity pending consider whether real job application, and therefore more advisable to follow in the process of productivity in the Head PL, behind the rest of the staff.
Actually, this position is no stranger to USPLL us, it was they who took delivery of C. Specific to pass them to C. Productivity (eg at night), but what is strange is that we will support other unions, and the outcome of the vote in the Bureau, despite the political bias reviewed, the complaint was rejected after a dubious interpretation of the rules of the current Framework Agreement. CCOO and USO
no agreements "behind the curtain", and believe that now is giving money to the police productivity of correturnos. Meter
fear alone results in more fear. This negotiating behind the curtain does not benefit those who are hidden negotiation, or to the other side of the curtain, allegedly benefited, because they have been deprived of a consolidation of compensation rights in the C. Specific, amply deserved and should be openly and proven, not dark and in constant penance.
Enough of wage increases with fireworks and wise men of unionism, to finally stay only with smoke, the smell of burnt horn and union kings are nothing more than a petty trileros.
Therefore, CCOO and USO, seek legal-technical report-writing, from where it belongs Processing and economic application of C. Staff productivity of this City.
Fd º: M ª José Muñoz Lozano.
CCOO union representative.
